Where the mind is free........

Tuesday, November 6, 2018

To all politicians and citizens


To all politicians


The Indian nationalistic movement was the origin of the Indian National Congress, INC. This version of nationalism was of the kind that included everyone against the colonial foreign ruler. It was markedly non-sectarian. It made a point to include everyone irrespective of the distinctions and use the principle of nonviolence.

It is necessary also to mention that before the administrative integration by the British there was no entity that could be called INDIA. There were small kingdoms and fiefdoms vying, battling and skirmishing with each other. It was a sad, strange but eventually benevolent destiny that it took colonialism to integrate this country of many geographies, languages, cultures, religions, cuisines and innumerable sub divisions of the kind, what in short is called the rich diversity of this country.

The nationalism of BJP is grounded on the majority Hindu sentiment. At first glance this is commendable. The shared values of this nation may be interpreted as originating from the legends of great epics Ramayana and Mahabharata. In fact at every corner of India and even extending to Afghanistan (Gandhar, Khandahar), Sri Lanka, South East Asia and many such, the legends can be traced. The sort of Nationalism that the BJP adheres to and advocates is called the cultural nationalism. And it is pronouncedly sectarian.

Thus differs the anti-colonial nationalism of the Congress and the religious cultural nationalism of the BJP. In a representational democracy, where numbers count, it is quite possible that the BJP stands to gain assuming every Hindu now accepts its version of nationalism and supports BJP. Is it desirable? It seems not. What would have happened if India had embraced religious cultural nationalism at the time of independence and framed the constitution accordingly? The nation would have been a majoritarian dominated one where the minorities would be second class citizens eventually fighting for dignity and even demanding separation. Knowing this, the framers of the constitution deliberately made minority rights and secularism a key hallmark of the constitution.  

If the guaranteed rights to the minorities have gone to be used to the excess, it needs to be corrected. It is also necessary that the minorities and majority be aware that nowhere in the world, given human collective atavistic nature, has such small minorities been spared of the excesses of the majority to the detriment of both. History is replete with such horrors of extermination of many a minority. Herein lies the greatness of INDIA we are told. It welcomed the others, so called outsiders, and history is replete with instances of such embracing. The Jews, the early Christians, early Muslims, the Zoroastrians and many such were welcomed in INDIA even as they were being persecuted and unwelcomed elsewhere. India’s diversity is the result of such inclusiveness. In fact invitingness and inclusiveness is the culture of India, so to say. What then is or should be the cultural nationalism of INDIA? The all-inclusive welcoming cultural nationalism or the ‘othering’ religious cultural nationalism? In short the nationalism of the Congress or that of the BJP?

I am afraid at the bottom of the current stresses is the strain on the resources due to overpopulation. When the population increases, the ethics turns to what is called the life boat ethics. As the resources deplete on a life boat, the altruistic nature of people give way to individualism, selfishness and atavism. The remaining find newer forms and reasons of otherness to predate on the other. And in India the otherness is right now based on religion. The flag bearers of this tendency is the advocates of the religious cultural nationalism.  

The ways of the left in India and elsewhere is also based on divisiveness from the very beginning between the so called haves and have-nots, between the rulers and the proletariat. Such approach goes through cycles depending on relative ‘havingness’ and ‘not havingness’.  Since essentially the left is also based on finding the right kind of ‘others’ to  hate,  it cannot be taken seriously except that at the bottom, it has a desire for universal distributive justice.

The only alternative for INDIA is therefore the all-inclusive welcoming cultural nationalism represented by the Indian National Congress. Perhaps the Left and other non BJP parties can keep their differences away and join in saving INDIA, majority and minority alike.

Monday, June 25, 2018

Strategy poem



Introduction
After Principles of Management,  look at how
Some among the companies though do better
To know what they differently do
Is indeed for us a truly great matter

Environmental View and Resource Based View
Long term planning they do
Forces they map of the outside
But some say something else they do
They look at resources they have inside

These two we term the environmental view
As of the opportunities and threats that lurk around
And the Resource based view
Along the strengths and weaknesses that they have inside

Generic Strategies

Differentiate, cost lead or focus
So said Michael Porter
We know them as generic strategies
For all MBAs to master

Set company, product, or service
And design integrated action to produce and deliver
Thereby customers perceive for them relevant difference
That’s Differentiation as they desire


Whereas, cost leadership is such business strategy
Basically a low cost approach.
With the lowest cost of operation in the industry
And excess frills they ever reproach

Focus though comes in two varieties
Cost focus and differentiation focus
Offering a specialized service in a cost concerned niche market
Or offering a specialized service in a premium niche market

Porter’s Five Forces / Structural Analysis
More on the environmental view
Porter saw the five forces
As playing much more than a few
Called the structural analysis of industries

Bargaining power of buyers
Such as the government in some industries that beckon
Meant that over the other forces
Was a powerful element to reckon.

Bargaining power of suppliers
Such as a dominant vendor
Meant that they were by many means
To be considered a major power

When something else can take its place
That’s Threat of substitutes
Like when coffee becomes too expensive
The switch to tea being pensive 

Where there are players many
We have intensity of rivalry
Though entry is relatively easy
Staying on becomes squeezy

That makes the last one barriers to entry
Hurdles many such as capital largely
Over long term all companies try
To keep other aspirers at bay

What is Strategy?  Porter
Okay but Porter says efficiency is not strategy
Over time all reach a frontier, though necessary
Make a position that one can preserve over the other
More the benchmarking, the more you look like one another

Choose a different set of tailored activities
The essence is unique activities
Variety, Need or Access based
Are the ways strategy is belaboured

Do one set of processes
But keep away from others
Strategy is uniquely made of
Activities thus traded off

Fit is how one’s activities configure
And how they relate to one another
Drives away others with such a chain thick
With as strong a chain as the strongest link